Subscribe

 

  • Button - Digg
  • Button - XML Reddit
  • Button - XML Newsvine
  • Button - XML Del.icio.us
  • Button - XML Feeds
  • Button - GoogleReader
  • Button - MyYahoo
  • Button - Rojo
  • Button - Bloglines

Links
Email
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Blog Index
    « Mandated Sustainability - here it comes! | Main | First Grey Water Irrigation System: Lessons »
    Monday
    14Dec2009

    The Synergy of Sustainability and Mitigation

    Preface by Grant:  Our guest blogger Barry Reid is highly qualified and he knows his stuff.  However, whether to accept this blog or not was a tough call - I heavily favor blog content where education and information outweigh the push of a specific product or organization - it just doesn't feel right for an education and credentialing organization to do otherwise.  Did I do my job as the gatekeeper on this one?  Also, send along your comments on the contents and product - I don't bowdlerize any response. 

    The Synergy of Sustainability and Mitigation
    By Barry Reid, LEED AP

    Those in the construction industry are fast learning that providing sustainably-built workplaces and homes is the smart thing to do socially, environmentally and economically. The industry is emerging from “green building” into an era where sustainability is table stakes, what you need to do just to get in the game. There is a commitment to implementing and abiding by practices that consistently conserve and efficiently use our limited resources.

    However, an important and relevant adjunct to sustainability is sometimes overlooked by architects, builders and developers – although never by insurers and regulators. By choosing the correct products and building practices, architects and builders can mitigate or even reduce the adverse effects on buildings from severe water damage as a result of wind-driven rain or flooding brought on by severe storms and natural disasters.

    Often, in at-risk areas, sustainable or green building practices end up conflicting with efforts that address mitigation, namely risk reduction to the building envelope and its long-term durability and performance. But sustainability and mitigation are synergistic concepts, and don’t need to be an either/or proposition. At Georgia-Pacific Gypsum, we’re suggesting that these two important issues can be addressed simultaneously at all stages of the building process – from design through final  onstruction.

    This combined effort makes effective use of sustainable products and practices while also taking steps to mitigate or minimize weather-related problems that may occur during the construction process or post-occupancy. It can help make buildings more energy efficient with better indoor air quality, and prevent or reduce weather-related damage.

    Lessons Learned, Courtesy of Mother Nature

    When sustainability and mitigation are not implemented, there can be unpleasant consequences.

    Consider the story of a fictional general contractor – we’ll call him Fred. Working with a design team of architects, consultants and sub-contractors, Fred has followed U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED® guidelines in constructing a one-story suburban office center on a previously developed site. He was diligent in addressing the environmental and health impacts of the building in addition to reducing the building’s overall energy use and water consumption. His team reused building materials from other local projects, selecting materials with high recycled content from regional sources.

    They installed low-water-use toilets and urinals. They selected low-VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) materials, and designed the building to be energy efficient, using both mechanical and natural ventilation strategies incorporated with natural light planning.

    Among the benefits of Fred’s design and construction practices were lower energy costs, thousands of gallons of water conserved and a healthy building where the workforce was proud to work.

    Unfortunately, Fred did not take into account the building’s location and any natural events that might adversely impact the use, disaster resistance, performance and recovery of the building. And indeed, something bad happened that Fred hadn’t envisioned – a 100-year flood, bringing a torrent of water into the building that finally crested at the two-foot mark. Because the building’s walls were constructed with conventional, paper-faced drywall (used for its recycled content), and the walls were insulated with water-absorbing insulation that was not moisture- or mold-resistant, Fred had to replace thousands of square feet of saturated materials – all of which got a permanent home in a landfill.

    Because mitigation measures were not considered in the construction phase, Fred’s well-intentioned sustainability efforts – that were an investment of an additional one to three percent of the building’s cost – ended up being anything but sustainable.

    On the other end of the spectrum, a builder – let’s call her Jen – remodeled a Victorian home in an area that had recently been rezoned for office use in a coastal region recovering from a devastating hurricane. Jen was determined to closely follow regulations from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for building in special flood hazard areas.*

    * To learn more about the FEMA requirements for construction in special flood hazard areas, visit www.gp.com/fema.

    Jen diligently followed mitigation guidelines, including the use of construction materials highly resistant to flood damage throughout the structure. She employed dozens of mitigation measures, such as installing hurricane shutters on entry doors and on all windows. Her mantra was simple: keep the water out, construct assemblies that dry easily when wet and use moisture-forgiving building materials.

    Unlike Fred, Jen didn’t give much thought to operational efficiencies or “green” methods. Her structure was a fortress that would likely survive a flood, but it was built to minimum standards, which resulted in an inefficient building with high utility costs and marginal comfort for future occupants.

    Sustainability + Mitigation = Durability

    These examples are fictional – but not unrealistic. Too often, building contractors and owners choose one or the other – sustainability or mitigation. A successful high-performance building should be built to last, but if sustainable practices and mitigation measures aren’t selected and implemented together, the building may not last its normal lifetime.

    Sustainability is more than LEED ratings and green certifications. And mitigation is more than risk aversion. A building must be durable from both perspectives.  

    Products that are durable and weather resistant are inherently sustainable, and they are at the center of Georgia-Pacific Gypsum’s product offerings – especially our Dens™ Brand of gypsum panels which are moisture-forgiving due to fiberglass mats and treated cores. They’re designed to mitigate the ill effects of exposure to water over the many stages of a building’s lifecycle.

    If you incur costly re-building due to a weather event, sustainability has been defeated. Homes and buildings should be designed and built to last, and building to sustainability and mitigation standards isn’t difficult. Here are a couple of common examples that demonstrate the concept.

    • Flooding can ruin the interior of a house or building. If you consider sustainability and mitigation at the beginning of the construction process, you’ll create a structure that just might survive flooding. Rigid or closed cell insulation prevents infiltration of water; borate treated lumber framing is water resistant; and non-paper faced drywall, such as DensArmor Plus® interior panels, resists moisture and mold-growth. With proper ventilation these construction materials allow for a drainable, dryable wall that resists mold growth. Even when the materials get wet, they will generally dry out without delaminating or developing mold – making mitigation a matter of time and “airing out” rather than replacing materials. (Note that in catastrophic situations, where polluted waters might sit for days inside structures, any type of gypsum panel and some other building materials would need to be evaluated for contamination by local building officials to determine if replacement is required.)

    • Wind-driven rain can also damage structures when it penetrates openings in soffits, under roofs and other openings such as vents. Sustainability and mitigation are achieved with a tight enclosure that resists moisture. However, the products you use must resist moisture too, so any water that gets in dries out without damaging walls and ceilings.  

    The answer is to create walls that have minimal openings to non-absorbent surfaces such as non-paper-faced drywall. Consider spray foam insulation at the knee walls/edge of the roof structure for your attic insulation strategies to stop wind-driven rain through the soffits.

    Employing sustainability and mitigation together doesn’t compromise the energy efficiency of a tightly built structure, but allows the “forgiveness” needed for the building products to dry out.

    Here are some additional tips to ensure that your projects properly blend sustainability and mitigation.

    Think and plan beyond green. With architects, contractors, owners and insurers at the table from the beginning, sustainability and mitigation are assured. A thorough, upfront assessment of the short- and long-term impact of every aspect of a building’s design, construction, and materials used will lessen the economic, environmental and societal burdens that could occur later.

    For instance, products that allow for draining, cleaning and drying are much better sustainability and mitigation choices than those that lead to tearing out and replacing in the wake of a severe weather event. Fiberglass mat panels – such as Dens™ Brand gypsum panels for use on exterior and interior surfaces of the building enclosure, behind tile in wet areas, in shafts and stairwells, and within a roofing system – can be used along with other water-resistant materials in wall cavities to provide a water management strategy that protects the value of the structure.

    Incorporate green when building to resist weather events. Recurring costs like utility expenses and insurance premiums, as well as the long-term marketability of the structure, should all play a role in when and how you choose building products and processes.

    Construction projects need to be infused with common sense as well as regulatory realities. A few pragmatic practices – like elevating structures in flood-prone regions and leaving the first floor for parking or entryways – can eliminate headaches later. The result will be well-designed and well-built structures that are durable, environmentally sound, economically relevant and socially significant.

    In other words, with a bit of effort, you can achieve the synergy of sustainability and mitigation.

    ©2009 Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC. All rights reserved.

    ________

    Barry Reid, LEED AP, has more than 20 years experience in the Building Products industry. He is Business Development Marketing Manager for Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC, whose current initiatives include integrating sustainable and building science principles into Georgia-Pacific’s building products to enhance the long- term performance of building enclosures in both residential and commercial construction.

     

    Reader Comments (12)

    Richard,

    Please tell me your kidding...I went to link and it was a sales pitch pure and simple. The blog links are commonly known within building industry.

    Got me thinking...looking back at your post; Does Richard know Barry? You state, "Barry's quals are impeccable and he knows what he's talking about". You even mention the company Georgia-Pacific Gypsum...

    So without disrespect, ask Barry to rewrite his blog.

    I don't think any of us in LinkedIn are the dog who ate the homework.

    Honestly Barry...I felt after reading, you where the middle man for the advertisement. Nice job!

    Merry Christmas
    Posted by George Rose, CET, CIT

    December 15, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGeorge Rose, CET, CIT

    This article is informative and not an overt 'sales pitch'. In fact, for consumers looking to budget for sustainable improvements it actually gives a great starting point and then further reach can compare competitive products.

    December 15, 2009 | Unregistered Commentersmd

    Rather than "rewrite" an article that has a sales angle or that is written by a manufacturer, why not just let others comment on their own experiences with the topic at hand. No one is keeping the commmentary of "done that, here is what worked and what didn't". Articles shouldn't be limited to installing contractors.
    Posted by Mike Filler, PE

    December 15, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMike Filler, PE

    This is strong educational piece and should be included in your blog. It provides a great starting point for those interested in improvement projects -- they can reach competitive products to the ones mentioned to make the best choice for their situation.
    Posted by Susan Duke

    December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSusan Duke

    Amen.
    Posted by Robert M. Lilienfeld

    December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRobert M. Lilienfeld

    I agree. I was hoping for more content on sustainable urban design and lefting reading corporations spinning their sustainable practices.
    Posted by Greg Winters

    December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGreg Winters

    I agree with Grant. There are important paradigm shifts going on in our profession with BIM & Autodesk Revit & other competing programs. It would be very good if discussions are collegial & helpful.

    Gail Ann J. Goldstead, AIA, LEED GA

    Agree with you Richard. More education then sales providing the benefit of the doubt in intention.
    The key message I get underligned by Barry, if I read it correctly, is that "Durability" is a key element of "Sustainability" since having to replace even the "greenest" material prematurely is the biggest waste.
    Let us not forget that one of the pillars of sustainability is Social (People) = education (= green human development)

    But let us keep "THEM" gypsum people on their tows when it comes down to recycling. Let them look at how their collegues are doing and not doing things correctly in Europe. Their gypsum screet floors will be not as bad as asbest but very difficult to demolish in the future without polluting other recyclable materials such as concrete and ceramics, endangering ground water contamination. Yet their mobile recycling of demolished dry walls is interesting.
    Posted by Boudewijn (Baudouin) Piscaer

    December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBoudewijn (Baudouin) Piscaer

    Interesting, well written, but it looks like an infomercial
    Posted by Frank Hurtte

    December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterFrank Hurtte

    hear hear!
    Posted by Lee Bouchard

    December 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLee Bouchard

    Grant, this should apply to all the Linked In blogs. I am close to shutting down some of the commercial real estate sections because of the cacophony of marketing messages overwhelming discussions which flies in the face of the purpose of linked in and clog the sites so finding related discourse becomes too time consuming. I am sure like most of us, you have little time for all the email traffic we already deal with every day. There are plenty of marketing sites available for these people. Lets have a revolt against these dolts.
    Posted by John Robbins

    December 20, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Robbins

    This was a great reminder of how deep and holistic the design of a truly sustainable building has to be - but I hated how the plugs were slipped in there. I don't care for sneakiness like this.

    December 22, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterцarьchitect

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>