Subscribe

 

  • Button - Digg
  • Button - XML Reddit
  • Button - XML Newsvine
  • Button - XML Del.icio.us
  • Button - XML Feeds
  • Button - GoogleReader
  • Button - MyYahoo
  • Button - Rojo
  • Button - Bloglines

Links
Email
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Blog Index
    « Brutally Honest Attack on Homebuilders? | Main | Career-Ending Liability & Green Goblin, Part 2 »
    Tuesday
    01Sep2009

    Commissioning & IPD for all in green building

    Preface by Grant:  Building commissioning and integrated project delivery impact the costs, efficiency and final outcomes of our projects with sustainability/green characteristics, whehter a LEED project or not.  Our guest blogger for this piece is architect Michael Heacock, a specialist in high performance green building design and LEED consulting services - take a look at his site for resources and interesting projects.  The title of this blog suggests that it is only applicable for architects, but if you are in any way involved in the green building process, you will find it informative and will call for you to expand your roles in new projects.


    Commissioning for Architects
    What, Where, When, Why, How?

    By Michael Heacock, Architect | LEED AP

    As architects, we weave the complexities of program, design, regulations, technology, budget and fee, while managing clients, projects, and liability. Proposed changes to our workflow frequently interrupt our momentum. Changes to our design process that seem burdensome ultimately transform our work and improve our buildings.  The process of commissioning is new to many of us, and we are finally learning how to make it an effective design tool.

    USGBC introduced commissioning to us by way of LEED-NC EA prerequisite 1: Fundamental Commissioning, and EA credit 3: Enhanced Commissioning. For most of us, our first question was, ”What is commissioning?” Fortunately there are several resources and industry experts, who are helping us understand this improvement and clarification to our evolving design process.

    Let’s start with some definitions:

    Building commissioning (Cx) provides documented confirmation that all building systems, including mechanical, electrical, lighting and controls function according to criteria set forth in the project documents to satisfy the owner’s operational needs.

    A commissioning agent (CxA) typically provides commissioning services as a consultant to the owner. On some LEED projects the CxA is hired by the architect.

    There are several documents that must be sequentially produced in order to satisfy LEED requirements:

    Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR):            Produced by Owner with Design Team & CxA assistance

    Basis of Design (BOD):                                         Produced by Design Team with CxA assistance

    Commissioning Specifications:                          By Architect/Spec Writer with CxA/ LEED Consultant assistance

    Commissioning Plan:                                           Produced by Contractor with CxA assistance

    Installation Verification & Performance Testing:           By CxA & Installing contractors

    O&M Staff Training:                                             By Installing Contractors & CxA

    Building Manual:                                                  By General Constractor with CxA assistance

    Summary Report:                                                 By CxA

    The intent of the commissioning process is to create the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) along with the program during pre-design. Unfortunately, most projects are well into design development or construction documents before a LEED consultant is hired and the commissioning process begins. So, ultimately the OPR is merely an exercise to satisfy LEED rather than being a useful design tool.

    In an “integrated design” process, commissioning begins during pre-design. Architects must coach their clients to complete the OPR during pre-design. Once the OPR is created, then the design team, led by the architect and engineers with the assistance of the CxA (or LEED consultant on small projects), produces the Basis of Design (BOD). From the BOD flows the project specifications, which require a commissioning section in addition to a LEED requirements section. As the design changes, the OPR and BOD should be updated to reflect those changes.

    At the beginning of construction the contractor takes the lead by producing a Commissioning Plan, which is outlined in the specifications. The CxA will facilitate a pre-construction meeting with the installing contractors and engineers to establish expectations and ensure that the design intent and commissioning requirements are understood. The CxA will work with contractors during installation and start-up as required to meet LEED requirements. Performance tests and construction photos provide backup documentation, which must be available for audit by USGBC.

    At the completion of construction a building manual will be produced by the contractor. O&M staff must be trained along with full time occupants of the facility. The CxA will produce a Commissioning Report, which summarizes the entire Cx process for the project. Frequently, this report is the last document uploaded into LEED online before the construction phase submittal to USGBC. Add another 5-8 weeks before the project receives certification from USGBC.

    We recommend the following resources for additional information and instruction:

    EDR Commissioning Handbook & Online Templates      www.energydesignresources.com

    USGBC: Who Can Commission?       www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=1262

    Commissioning On Purpose, by Coleman & Coleman   www.eeiengineers.com

    US Dept. of Energy Building Toolbox       www.eere.energy.gov

    Commissioning Resources                                                 www.michaelheacock.com/toolslinks/commissioning.html

     

    Reader Comments (7)

    I enjoyed the article. It is very informative. I currently work with the developers of the Genosha Hotel in Oshawa, Ontario and Mr. Heacock's description of the process at the beginning of any construction allowed me to better understand the dynamics associated with new developments.

    I truly enjoyed the article. Thanks for sharing!
    Posted by Amanda Lee

    September 1, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAmanda Lee

    Grant/Michael:

    Thanks for the post/link. What an excellent overview of the Cx process Michael gave! Super! And, you are right; the target audience is architects, but understanding and applying the Cx process is NOT just for Architects. Cx is, after all, mostly about the Operations and Maintenance of buildings, so the O&M folks are deeply involved. Commercial building owners/operators need to be using Cx to drive cost reductions in energy and maintenance. Major industrial, commercial, governmental entities are finding that this is true for their properties too. Cx is about ensuring you get what you already paid for! To not commission a new building or major remodel is to pretty much guarantee excessive maintenance costs and higher energy costs.

    In my recent experience, working for a major IT/computer company, we were able to save many hundreds of thousands of dollars per new building project by developing and executing our internal Cx process. The program pays for itself!

    Last comment is more of an opinion -- I'm a strong advocate having a "3rd party" CxA. You can fill the CxA role with internal O&M staff (if you have the staff and they have the time), but you do not generally want to leave the CxA role to the General Contractor or Design Contractor. You really need the CxA to be a strong owner advocate.

    Three cheers for Commissioning!

    September 3, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJeff Krech

    Thanks for the post/link. What an excellent overview of the Cx process Michael gave! Super! And, you are right; the target audience is architects, but understanding and applying the Cx process is NOT just for Architects. Cx is, after all, mostly about the Operations and Maintenance of buildings, so the O&M folks are deeply involved. Commercial building owners/operators need to be using Cx to drive cost reductions in energy and maintenance. Major industrial, commercial, governmental entities are finding that this is true for their properties too. Cx is about ensuring you get what you already paid for! To not commission a new building or major remodel is to pretty much guarantee excessive maintenance costs and higher energy costs.

    In my recent experience, working for a major IT/computer company, we were able to save many hundreds of thousands of dollars per new building project by developing and executing our internal Cx process. The program pays for itself!

    Last comment is more of an opinion -- I'm a strong advocate having a "3rd party" CxA. You can fill the CxA role with internal O&M staff (if you have the staff and they have the time), but you do not generally want to leave the CxA role to the General Contractor or Design Contractor. You really need the CxA to be a strong owner advocate.

    Three cheers for Commissioning!
    Posted by Jeff Krech

    September 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJeff Krech

    True... commissioning & IPD are very important.... but pieces of a larger pie...
    Posted by Peter Cholakis

    September 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPeter Cholakis

    Interesting article, but it ignores the importance of commissioning the building enclosure and the NIBS and ASHRE Guidlines that define the process. If the building enclosure is not functioning at a high level the HVAC systems can not perform at their optimum efficiency, wasting energy and/or reducing comfort levels.

    GB
    Posted by George M. Blackburn, AIA

    September 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGeorge M. Blackburn, AIA

    Interesting article with some good references, but it ignores the importance of commissioning the building enclosure and the NIBS and ASHRE Guidelines for commissioning (Cx). If the building enclosure is not performing at a high level HVAC systems can not achieve their optimum performance levels.

    GB

    September 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGeorge M. Blackburn, AIA

    Grant,

    Thanks for posting this. I'm forwarding it to all my engineers and architects.

    Pam
    Posted by Pamela Scott

    September 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPamela Scott

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>